Skip to main content

Why Traditional Labs Fail, and What We Can Do About It

Cornell Affiliated Author(s)

Author

N.G. Holmes

Abstract

Science is, at its core, an empirical discipline: Theories must coordinate with evidence obtained through systematic, scientific investigations. Learning science involves learning how science is done, not just what science has found, and so nearly every introductory college science course has an associated laboratory component. The value of these labs, however, has often been called into question, particularly when considering concerns about the associated space, time, equipment, and personnel needs. While most scientists would argue that science education must include lab experiences, there had been little research done to study their effectiveness. As evidence begins to accumulate, it has become clear that traditional, overly structured labs designed to reinforce lecture material have little educational benefit. This chapter aims to answer the questions: Why? and What do we do about it?. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020.

Date Published

Journal

Active Learning in College Science: The Case for Evidence-Based Practice

Number of Pages

271-290,

ISBN Number

978-3-030-33600-4 978-3-030-33599-1

URL

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095544026&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-33600-4_18&partnerID=40&md5=639d7ed0de5ec5abe76d7d3b30717180

Group (Lab)

Natasha Holmes Group

Download citation